Certification PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Training | Latest ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Test Prep
Our company can guarantee that our ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager actual questions are the most reliable. Having gone through about 10 years' development, we still pay effort to develop high quality ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager study materials and be patient with all of our customers, therefore you can trust us completely. In addition, you may wonder if our ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Study Materials become outdated. Our ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager actual questions are updated in a high speed. And you will enjoy the ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager test guide freely for one year, which can save your time and money. We will send you the latest ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager study materials through your email.
PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Exam Syllabus Topics:
Topic
Details
Topic 1
Topic 2
Topic 3
Topic 4
>> Certification PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Training <<
2025 ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager: PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27005 Risk Manager Marvelous Certification Training
Nowadays the competition in the society is fiercer and if you don't have a specialty you can't occupy an advantageous position in the competition and may be weeded out. Passing the test ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager certification can help you be competent in some area and gain the competition advantages in the labor market. If you buy our ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Study Materials you will pass the ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager test smoothly. Our product boosts many advantages and it is your best choice to prepare for the test. Our ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager learning prep is compiled by our first-rate expert team and linked closely with the real exam.
PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27005 Risk Manager Sample Questions (Q55-Q60):
NEW QUESTION # 55
Scenario 8: Biotide is a pharmaceutical company that produces medication for treating different kinds of diseases. The company was founded in 1997, and since then it has contributed in solving some of the most challenging healthcare issues.
As a pharmaceutical company, Biotide operates in an environment associated with complex risks. As such, the company focuses on risk management strategies that ensure the effective management of risks to develop high-quality medication. With the large amount of sensitive information generated from the company, managing information security risks is certainly an important part of the overall risk management process. Biotide utilizes a publicly available methodology for conducting risk assessment related to information assets. This methodology helps Biotide to perform risk assessment by taking into account its objectives and mission. Following this method, the risk management process is organized into four activity areas, each of them involving a set of activities, as provided below.
1. Activity area 1: The organization determines the criteria against which the effects of a risk occurring can be evaluated. In addition, the impacts of risks are also defined.
2. Activity area 2: The purpose of the second activity area is to create information asset profiles. The organization identifies critical information assets, their owners, as well as the security requirements for those assets. After determining the security requirements, the organization prioritizes them. In addition, the organization identifies the systems that store, transmit, or process information.
3. Activity area 3: The organization identifies the areas of concern which initiates the risk identification process. In addition, the organization analyzes and determines the probability of the occurrence of possible threat scenarios.
4. Activity area 4: The organization identifies and evaluates the risks. In addition, the criteria specified in activity area 1 is reviewed and the consequences of the areas of concerns are evaluated. Lastly, the level of identified risks is determined.
The table below provides an example of how Biotide assesses the risks related to its information assets following this methodology:
Based on scenario 8, how should Biotide use the criteria defined in the activity area 1?
Answer: B
Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27005, which provides guidelines for information security risk management, the criteria defined in Activity Area 1 are used to establish the foundation for evaluating the effects of a risk event on an organization's objectives. This is the first step in the risk management process, where the organization must identify its risk evaluation criteria, including the impact levels and their corresponding definitions.
In the context of Biotide, Activity Area 1 involves determining the criteria against which the effects of a risk occurring can be evaluated and defining the impacts of those risks. This directly aligns with ISO/IEC 27005 guidance, where the purpose of setting criteria is to ensure that the potential impact of any risk on the organization's objectives, such as reputation, customer confidence, and legal implications, is comprehensively understood and appropriately managed.
Option A, "To evaluate the potential impact of the risk on Biotide's objectives," is correct because it accurately describes the purpose of defining such criteria: to provide a consistent basis for assessing how various risk scenarios might affect the organization's ability to meet its strategic and operational goals.
Options B and C, which focus on identifying assets or determining the probability of threats, are related to later stages in the risk management process (specifically, Activities 2 and 3), where information assets are profiled and potential threat scenarios are analyzed. Therefore, these do not correspond to the initial criteria definition purpose outlined in Activity Area 1.
NEW QUESTION # 56
Scenario 6: Productscape is a market research company headquartered in Brussels, Belgium. It helps organizations understand the needs and expectations of their customers and identify new business opportunities. Productscape's teams have extensive experience in marketing and business strategy and work with some of the best-known organizations in Europe. The industry in which Productscape operates requires effective risk management. Considering that Productscape has access to clients' confidential information, it is responsible for ensuring its security. As such, the company conducts regular risk assessments. The top management appointed Alex as the risk manager, who is responsible for monitoring the risk management process and treating information security risks.
The last risk assessment conducted was focused on information assets. The purpose of this risk assessment was to identify information security risks, understand their level, and take appropriate action to treat them in order to ensure the security of their systems. Alex established a team of three members to perform the risk assessment activities. Each team member was responsible for specific departments included in the risk assessment scope. The risk assessment provided valuable information to identify, understand, and mitigate the risks that Productscape faces.
Initially, the team identified potential risks based on the risk identification results. Prior to analyzing the identified risks, the risk acceptance criteria were established. The criteria for accepting the risks were determined based on Productscape's objectives, operations, and technology. The team created various risk scenarios and determined the likelihood of occurrence as "low," "medium," or "high." They decided that if the likelihood of occurrence for a risk scenario is determined as "low," no further action would be taken. On the other hand, if the likelihood of occurrence for a risk scenario is determined as "high" or "medium," additional controls will be implemented. Some information security risk scenarios defined by Productscape's team were as follows:
1. A cyber attacker exploits a security misconfiguration vulnerability of Productscape's website to launch an attack, which, in turn, could make the website unavailable to users.
2. A cyber attacker gains access to confidential information of clients and may threaten to make the information publicly available unless a ransom is paid.
3. An internal employee clicks on a link embedded in an email that redirects them to an unsecured website, installing a malware on the device.
The likelihood of occurrence for the first risk scenario was determined as "medium." One of the main reasons that such a risk could occur was the usage of default accounts and password. Attackers could exploit this vulnerability and launch a brute-force attack. Therefore, Productscape decided to start using an automated "build and deploy" process which would test the software on deploy and minimize the likelihood of such an incident from happening. However, the team made it clear that the implementation of this process would not eliminate the risk completely and that there was still a low possibility for this risk to occur. Productscape documented the remaining risk and decided to monitor it for changes.
The likelihood of occurrence for the second risk scenario was determined as "medium." Productscape decided to contract an IT company that would provide technical assistance and monitor the company's systems and networks in order to prevent such incidents from happening.
The likelihood of occurrence for the third risk scenario was determined as "high." Thus, Productscape decided to include phishing as a topic on their information security training sessions. In addition, Alex reviewed the controls of Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001 in order to determine the necessary controls for treating this risk. Alex decided to implement control A.8.23 Web filtering which would help the company to reduce the risk of accessing unsecure websites. Although security controls were implemented to treat the risk, the level of the residual risk still did not meet the risk acceptance criteria defined in the beginning of the risk assessment process. Since the cost of implementing additional controls was too high for the company, Productscape decided to accept the residual risk. Therefore, risk owners were assigned the responsibility of managing the residual risk.
Which risk treatment option was used for the second risk scenario? Refer to scenario 6.
Answer: B
Explanation:
Risk sharing, also known as risk transfer, involves sharing the risk with another party, such as through insurance or outsourcing certain activities to third-party vendors. In Scenario 6, Productscape decided to contract an IT company to provide technical assistance and monitor the company's systems and networks to prevent incidents related to the second risk scenario (gaining access to confidential information and threatening to make it public unless a ransom is paid). This is an example of risk sharing because Productscape transferred part of the risk management responsibilities to an external company. Thus, the correct answer is C, Risk sharing.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27005:2018, Clause 8.6, "Risk Treatment," which includes risk sharing as an option where a third party is used to manage specific risks.
NEW QUESTION # 57
An organization has installed security cameras and alarm systems. What type of information security control has been implemented in this case?
Answer: C
Explanation:
Security cameras and alarm systems are considered technical controls in the context of information security. Technical controls, also known as logical controls, involve the use of technology to protect information and information systems. These controls are designed to prevent or detect security breaches and mitigate risks related to physical access and surveillance. While security cameras and alarms are physical in nature, they fall under the broader category of technical controls because they involve electronic monitoring and alert systems. Option B (Managerial) refers to administrative policies and procedures, and option C (Legal) refers to controls related to compliance with laws and regulations, neither of which applies in this case.
NEW QUESTION # 58
Scenario 6: Productscape is a market research company headquartered in Brussels, Belgium. It helps organizations understand the needs and expectations of their customers and identify new business opportunities. Productscape's teams have extensive experience in marketing and business strategy and work with some of the best-known organizations in Europe. The industry in which Productscape operates requires effective risk management. Considering that Productscape has access to clients' confidential information, it is responsible for ensuring its security. As such, the company conducts regular risk assessments. The top management appointed Alex as the risk manager, who is responsible for monitoring the risk management process and treating information security risks.
The last risk assessment conducted was focused on information assets. The purpose of this risk assessment was to identify information security risks, understand their level, and take appropriate action to treat them in order to ensure the security of their systems. Alex established a team of three members to perform the risk assessment activities. Each team member was responsible for specific departments included in the risk assessment scope. The risk assessment provided valuable information to identify, understand, and mitigate the risks that Productscape faces.
Initially, the team identified potential risks based on the risk identification results. Prior to analyzing the identified risks, the risk acceptance criteria were established. The criteria for accepting the risks were determined based on Productscape's objectives, operations, and technology. The team created various risk scenarios and determined the likelihood of occurrence as "low," "medium," or "high." They decided that if the likelihood of occurrence for a risk scenario is determined as "low," no further action would be taken. On the other hand, if the likelihood of occurrence for a risk scenario is determined as "high" or "medium," additional controls will be implemented. Some information security risk scenarios defined by Productscape's team were as follows:
1. A cyber attacker exploits a security misconfiguration vulnerability of Productscape's website to launch an attack, which, in turn, could make the website unavailable to users.
2. A cyber attacker gains access to confidential information of clients and may threaten to make the information publicly available unless a ransom is paid.
3. An internal employee clicks on a link embedded in an email that redirects them to an unsecured website, installing a malware on the device.
The likelihood of occurrence for the first risk scenario was determined as "medium." One of the main reasons that such a risk could occur was the usage of default accounts and password. Attackers could exploit this vulnerability and launch a brute-force attack. Therefore, Productscape decided to start using an automated "build and deploy" process which would test the software on deploy and minimize the likelihood of such an incident from happening. However, the team made it clear that the implementation of this process would not eliminate the risk completely and that there was still a low possibility for this risk to occur. Productscape documented the remaining risk and decided to monitor it for changes.
The likelihood of occurrence for the second risk scenario was determined as "medium." Productscape decided to contract an IT company that would provide technical assistance and monitor the company's systems and networks in order to prevent such incidents from happening.
The likelihood of occurrence for the third risk scenario was determined as "high." Thus, Productscape decided to include phishing as a topic on their information security training sessions. In addition, Alex reviewed the controls of Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001 in order to determine the necessary controls for treating this risk. Alex decided to implement control A.8.23 Web filtering which would help the company to reduce the risk of accessing unsecure websites. Although security controls were implemented to treat the risk, the level of the residual risk still did not meet the risk acceptance criteria defined in the beginning of the risk assessment process. Since the cost of implementing additional controls was too high for the company, Productscape decided to accept the residual risk. Therefore, risk owners were assigned the responsibility of managing the residual risk.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Which risk treatment option was used for the first risk scenario?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Risk modification involves implementing measures to reduce the likelihood or impact of a risk. In the first risk scenario, Productscape decided to use an automated "build and deploy" process to reduce the likelihood of an attacker exploiting a security misconfiguration vulnerability. This action aims to lower the risk to an acceptable level, which is characteristic of risk modification. Option B (Risk avoidance) would involve eliminating the risk by avoiding the activity altogether, which is not what was done. Option C (Risk sharing) involves transferring some or all of the risk to a third party, which is not applicable in this scenario.
NEW QUESTION # 59
Scenario 5: Detika is a private cardiology clinic in Pennsylvania, the US. Detika has one of the most advanced healthcare systems for treating heart diseases. The clinic uses sophisticated apparatus that detects heart diseases in early stages. Since 2010, medical information of Detika's patients is stored on the organization's digital systems. Electronic health records (EHR), among others, include patients' diagnosis, treatment plan, and laboratory results.
Storing and accessing patient and other medical data digitally was a huge and a risky step for Detik a. Considering the sensitivity of information stored in their systems, Detika conducts regular risk assessments to ensure that all information security risks are identified and managed. Last month, Detika conducted a risk assessment which was focused on the EHR system. During risk identification, the IT team found out that some employees were not updating the operating systems regularly. This could cause major problems such as a data breach or loss of software compatibility. In addition, the IT team tested the software and detected a flaw in one of the software modules used. Both issues were reported to the top management and they decided to implement appropriate controls for treating the identified risks. They decided to organize training sessions for all employees in order to make them aware of the importance of the system updates. In addition, the manager of the IT Department was appointed as the person responsible for ensuring that the software is regularly tested.
Another risk identified during the risk assessment was the risk of a potential ransomware attack. This risk was defined as low because all their data was backed up daily. The IT team decided to accept the actual risk of ransomware attacks and concluded that additional measures were not required. This decision was documented in the risk treatment plan and communicated to the risk owner. The risk owner approved the risk treatment plan and documented the risk assessment results.
Following that, Detika initiated the implementation of new controls. In addition, one of the employees of the IT Department was assigned the responsibility for monitoring the implementation process and ensure the effectiveness of the security controls. The IT team, on the other hand, was responsible for allocating the resources needed to effectively implement the new controls.
Based on scenario 5, the decision to accept the risk of a potential ransomware attack was approved by the risk owner. Is this acceptable?
Answer: A
Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27005, the risk treatment plan should be approved by the risk owners, who are the individuals or entities responsible for managing specific risks. In the scenario, the risk owner approved the decision to accept the risk of a potential ransomware attack and documented it in the risk treatment plan. This is consistent with the guidelines, which state that risk owners are responsible for deciding on risk treatment and approving the associated plans. Thus, option C is the correct answer.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27005:2018, Clause 8.6, "Risk Treatment," which emphasizes that risk treatment plans should be approved by the risk owners.
NEW QUESTION # 60
......
We consider the actual situation of the test-takers and provide them with high-quality ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager learning materials at a reasonable price. Choose the ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager test guide absolutely excellent quality and reasonable price, because the more times the user buys the ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager test guide, the more discounts he gets. In order to make the user's whole experience smoother, we also provide a thoughtful package of services. Once users have any problems related to the ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager learning questions, our staff will help solve them as soon as possible.
Latest ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Test Prep: https://www.trainingdump.com/PECB/ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager-practice-exam-dumps.html
